Feasibility sprint
Can this actually work on your data? We run the experiment end to end and write up what we learn.
No discovery theatre. No slide marathons. Two weeks in, you have a working AI prototype on real data that your team can pressure-test.
The AI Sprint is a fixed-scope, fixed-price, fixed-timeline engagement that takes one well-formed use case from idea to a working answer in two to four weeks. It runs on your data inside your environment from week one. The deliverable is a functioning thing, an evaluation report against measurable criteria, and a written recommendation, including, sometimes, the recommendation not to build it. A sprint isn't a mini-project. It's designed to produce one demonstrable answer, so you can decide whether to invest, adjust, or walk away.
Can this actually work on your data? We run the experiment end to end and write up what we learn.
A working thing, in your environment, connected to real data, ready for user testing.
A buildable, governed design for a larger initiative, before you commit to a full build.
Fixed scope, fixed fee, fixed timeline. No scope creep, no change orders billed on Friday afternoon.
Two of your people pair with two of ours. Knowledge transfer is built in.
Working code, written memo, recorded demo. Everything your board needs to say yes or no.
A two-engineer EIS pod runs the sprint, embedded in your Slack and your repo. Your team contributes a product owner, a data steward, and a domain expert. That's the team, no steering committee, no weekly status decks.
Kickoff Monday. By Friday we've signed off the success metric, audited the data, mapped the integration surface, and stood up the dev environment. If the data isn't ready, we say so, and the sprint pauses until it is.
End-to-end thin slice. Ugly, partial, but real. It runs on your data and produces output you can read. We show it Friday, the first checkpoint where the project can be killed cleanly.
Eval-driven development. Every change is measured against the week-one rubric. Prompts, retrieval, fine-tunes, whatever the data tells us. Cost and latency tracked alongside accuracy.
Final eval, written recommendation, handover. Three possible answers, build it, kill it, or run a second sprint with this scope adjustment. We do not optimise for 'build it'.
Two AI Sprints in parallel, one for invoice extraction, one for an inbound-call triage agent. Same cadence, same eval rubric standard. Different answers, fast.
Shipped to production at week four. Accuracy on a held-out month of invoices.
Killed at week two with evidence. Avoided spend on a six-figure vendor contract.
From kickoff to a defensible go/no-go memo on both initiatives.
The killed sprint was more valuable than the one that shipped. We were three weeks from signing a six-figure vendor contract.
VP Operations · regional logistics operator
30-minute call to decide whether a sprint fits, and which of the three shapes is right for you.